Dave007 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 'The very condition of a deconstruction may be at work in the work, within the system to be deconstructed. It may already be located there, already at work. Not at the center, but in an eccentric center, in a corner whose eccentricity assures the solid concentration of the system, participating in the construction of what it, at the same time, threatens to deconstruct. One might then be inclined to reach this conclusion: deconstruction is not an operation that supervenes afterwards, from the outside, one fine day. It is always already at work in the work. Since the destructive force of Deconstruction is always already contained within the very architecture of the work, all one would finally have to do to be able to deconstruct, given this always already, is to do memory work. Yet since I want neither to accept nor to reject a conclusion formulated in precisely these terms, let us leave this question suspended for the moment.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedawg Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 (edited) I am afraid Dave has gone off the farm. Edited February 21, 2015 by bluedawg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvparrots Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 .................................Amen.............................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katana600 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Jacques Derrida 'Paradoxically, a person who is at once both extremely private and extremely public, Derrida is one of the most important, profound and intriguing thinkers living today.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Dave....did you fall off your perch and bump your head ...again???? In all seriouslness.....that's what I call "a thought provoking post". :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdhouse Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 (edited) That's someone to avoid if you don't want a headache. Why can't these people regurgitate their bright ideas in a form real people might actually understand..? Just sayin. "The British stage magician Nevil Maskelyne wrote in 1908: "It is an experience common to all men to find that, on any special occasion, such as the production of a magical effect for the first time in public, everything that can go wrong will go wrong. Whether we must attribute this to the malignity of matter or to the total depravity of inanimate things, whether the exciting cause is hurry, worry, or what not, the fact remains.[4] The contemporary form of Murphy's law goes back as far as 1952, as an epigraph to a mountaineering book by John Sack, who described it as an "ancient mountaineering adage": Anything that can possibly go wrong, does." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law Like the man said or at least I think he said, it's all been said before at one time or another, in some form or another. 'It's not easy to improvise, it's the most difficult thing to do. Even when one improvises in front of a camera or microphone, one ventriloquizes or leaves another to speak in one's place the schemas and languages that are already there. There are already a great number of prescriptions that are prescribed in our memory and in our culture. All the names are already preprogrammed. It's already the names that inhibit our ability to ever really improvise. One can't say what ever one wants, one is obliged more or less to reproduce the stereotypical discourse. And so I believe in improvisation and I fight for improvisation. But always with the belief that it's impossible. And there where there is improvisation I am not able to see myself. I am blind to myself. And it's what I will see, no, I won't see it. It's for others to see. The one who is improvised here, no I won't ever see him.' JACQUES DERRIDA UNPUBLISHED INTERVIEW, 1982 http://www.derridathemovie.com/readings.html Whereas Dave... now he just throws these things out there to see what happens. Then sits back & laughs. Truly brilliant! Edited February 22, 2015 by birdhouse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
judygram Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 ""Whereas Dave... now he just throws these things out there to see what happens. Then sits back & laughs. Truly brilliant! ;)"" Said Val. That's our Dave!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greywings Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 I am afraid he is headed for the political arena. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdhouse Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 I am afraid he is headed for the political arena. Said w/love big guy, but if that's so then I think we should all be afraid. Very afraid!! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kins2321@yahoo.com Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 Im thinking Jacques Derrida was high when he wrote that, and Dave was perfectly normal when he read it. LOL! What IS your IQ Dave? I know you know! Nancy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave007 Posted March 5, 2015 Author Share Posted March 5, 2015 Im thinking Jacques Derrida was high when he wrote that, and Dave was perfectly normal when he read it. LOL! What IS your IQ Dave? I know you know! Nancy I'm not aware of the persona of the IQ situational convention in the trapazoid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdhouse Posted March 5, 2015 Share Posted March 5, 2015 I heard you say that to all the girls. ") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now